More Infinity

So this summer's attempts to get Infinity off the ground here have met with all of our usual distractions, half attempts, and false starts. Still progress is being made - as proof here are some WIP shots of the latest conversion I picked up, a 1:55 fire truck from Disney's Cars line.

I cut away the plastic ladder on top, added an old plastic Rhino end to the back, and covered the mouth on the lower front with a door from an old Rhino. For the other I cut rear doors from plasticard.

The tops are too large and open to leave bare, but I haven't decided what to put up there yet, probably a couple of vents made from aerator parts, some stowage, maybe a winch or mechanical arm from an old mech warrior.

I am going to leave these as civilian vehicles, so probably a white paint job with some sort of color accent.

Prepping for Infinity

Every year it seems Miscon gets a few of us excited about some old game that hasn't made it to the backwoods here.

This year it was Infinity - it's not like it hasn't been all over the net for years, but getting the impetus going locally has been hard. This year Mike U's great set up finally got the ball rolling. No problem for me, I had already started on the road to building 28mm Tomorrow's War so this coincides with that.

First part is putting together scenery and to that end I am soliciting opinions before I 3D print these. Are the square windows too Modern versus the Octagonal ones, or in other terms, insufficiently SCI FI? Square is more practical to build and for real world applications, but I wonder if they won't look futuristic enough?


Anyway,  input please.

Option 1           Square Windows

Over all layout

Option 2          Octagonal Windows
 

Combat Cards for Bloody Fields, Petty Kings

Despite the rather unassuming and unoriginal name these have worked quite well, so I have used the Magic Set Editor program to do up some better looking cards. So far there are twenty some different ones, the deck we used for today's  game had two of each plus a dozen of the Attack cards for 66 total.

I want to add some more as we play, ending up with 46 unique cards and 14 Attack cards.

While the above cards have fairly old artwork, most of these have art cheerfully purloined from the net so I won't post them but if anyone wants the working file let me know.

Bloody Fields, Petty Kings combat

Several more pseudo games have helped focus the combat system - it is still buckets of dice, but it works.

The changes and summary

The ratios have been tightened up with some smaller gradients on the upper end,
3/1↔5/2↔2/1↔3/2↔5/4↔1/1↔2/3↔1/2↔1/3↔1/4

Note that currently the highest is now only  3/1, that may yet need ratcheted down further. The problem is 3/1 works fine on an 8 figure unit, becomes cumbersome for 12, and for a 20 spear goblin unit is a pain, especially with retaining the exploding die. Of course to get goblins up there would take seven steps, so when would that actually happen.

Anyway, combat goes;

• Figure base ratios and apply situational modifiers
• Play combat cards, recalculate dice if needed
• Allocate combat dice between defense and attack
• Roll, both sides take casualties
• Morale
• Follow up

Combat is slower and some of the sample melees hung on for six or eight turns while others were knocked out in 1. As a result there are some new overrun rules and new rules for overlapping, and an overrun for when a combat collapses on the first round.

The casualty recovery has been retained, it can be tricky deciding when to try though.

I like the way this combat system has played out - once players are use to the system there is very little to look up and both players have a couple of decision points which are made at the same time, keeping things moving quickly.

Also, in an RPG there are few things more frustrating than an encounter which is preordained. You as a player cannot control when or even if it happens, what you do, and surely not how it will all turn out. You are just there to spectate. Such encounters leads to complaints of railroading and gnashing of teeth along with a heavy dose of resentment towards iron handed DMs.

It is far worse in a competitive  miniatures game where the other player can't try to use a position of impartiality to justify your helplessness. I know how mad I can feel and I have seen others actually quit a game in frustration.

So in designing a game how should this be handled?

First by giving players some control by giving them options. When charged or subjected to a spell a player should be able to do something that makes a difference or has a chance, even if it is small. For example a unit of archers is charged suddenly by a fast moving bunch of cavalry. What should the charged player be able to do?

• at minimum, stand and fight
• run, hoping to outdistance the charger
• rush with the bravest few as a forlorn hope while the rest run, again hoping not to be slaughtered.
• charge
• fire as they come

This is just musing on my part, but as I go forward it needs to be kept in mind.

Tomorrow War Train

As we are getting into Tomorrow War I have been looking into some better terrain for 28mm sci fi than what  I already have.

The storage containers were the first large project and spurred on by a thread on LAF I was inspired to look at modifying the containers into a sci fi train. In looking at different images on Google I have been leaning more and more towards taking inspiration from the hover train in Firefly. That eliminates the need for a scale track and more important wheels which would be a bear to model.

So the issue becomes a low and wide train which is more practical from a reality perspective or high and narrow which makes the train as wide as a modern one and gives as much of a terrain visual break as most buildings.

Tall and Narrow

 

Any one have input before I make a choice and have it printed up?